Aj-Mega | 27 points | May 18 2017 23:48:48

[MOVIE] Moana (2016) 1080p HQ 12bit BluRay DTS x265 HEVC-PSA [1080p] [12bit] [x265] [6.54GB]

DEAD

permalink

[-] gomson | 4 points | May 19 2017 10:36:52

It's gone :-(

permalink

[-] boltrop | 1 points | May 18 2017 23:51:07

Moana (2016)

Genre: Animation, Adventure, Comedy, Family, Fantasy, Musical

Rating: 7.7 (116372 votes)

Certification: PG

Runtime: 107 min


Director(s): Ron Clements, Don Hall

Writer(s): Jared Bush, Ron Clements

Cast: Auli'i Cravalho, Dwayne Johnson, Rachel House, Temuera Morrison

Plot: In Ancient Polynesia, when a terrible curse incurred by the Demigod Maui reaches an impetuous Chieftain's daughter's island, she answers the Ocean's call to seek out the Demigod to set things right.


^This ^summary ^is ^taken ^from ^imdb.com ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha

permalink

[-] SubZorro | 1 points | May 18 2017 23:53:05

Subtitles for this movie:


^This ^list ^of ^subtitles ^are ^taken ^from ^opensubtitles.org ^| ^For ^feedback ^or ^suggestions ^contact ^/u/indigo6alpha

permalink

[-] C_McButterpants | 1 points | May 19 2017 11:30:55

Is the remux source even 10bit? I know there are supposed to be marginal quality gains by encoding in 10bit; and here they're trying 12... but comparing the sample to an 8.2GB h.264 encode — there is a definite loss of detail on close inspection.

It's not so bad that any of this is actually perceived while watching the movie; but why go to al that trouble, and then incur extra processing overhead, all for 2+GB space saving?

A proper 8bit:x265 encoding could be done at around 6GB whilst preserving enough detail and including the full DTS soundtrack.

Could someone tell the doctor he dropped something over here...

permalink

[-] sakfsjaf | 1 points | May 19 2017 15:02:11

but comparing the sample to an 8.2GB h.264 encode — there is a definite loss of detail on close inspection.

Loss of detail on the 8.2GB H.264 encode or this 12 bit x265 encode?

permalink

[-] C_McButterpants | 1 points | May 19 2017 15:32:04

This encode attempt is of poorer quality than the x264 version I have; this being my whole point—why put all that effort in?

permalink